One thing that’s really struck me in doing background readings is just how controversial Austen is. When I read her books, it’s perfectly clear to me what she’s saying, and what the story means and how it’s to be interpreted. And then I read someone else’s take on it, and they see things exactly opposite, and what’s worse, they have a point!

There’s Kingsley Amis saying that “Edmund and Fanny are both morally detestable and the endorsement of their feelings and behavior by the author … makes Mansfield Park an immoral book” (in “What Became of Jane Austen”, A Truth Universally Acknowledged, p.125); he much prefers the Crawfords. And then there’s Colleen Sheehan saying that the Crawfords are machiavellian monsters, horrifically evil to the core. In Sense and Sensibility, lots of readers want to marry Elinor to Colonel Brandon, because they think that Elinor deserves better than Edward or Colonel Brandon better than Marianne. Or they feel that Marianne is the sacrificial lamb on the altar of patriarchy, that her marriage to Brandon is a sad instance of her exuberant spirit having been beaten into submission by society’s (and Elinor’s) expectations of what a woman ought to be, and that the ending of this book is really lame and ought to have been written differently. And so on and so forth.

And those debates have been going on ever since the books first came out! Lovely, simple, easy-to-understand romances? I don’t think so.


2 thoughts on “Controversy

  1. You are right, of course, these are not simple romances. But we must not forget that amidst the bad characters, even the borderline-awful and despicable characters, Jane Austen always saved a place for the pretty good folks. Besides the heroes and heroines in her novels, my favorites are the Gardiners and the Crofts. They actually grew up without Jane Austen’s tutelage. I think maybe they were Jane Austen’s teachers. Surely, they could have been. There is no doubt in my mind that she loved and respected the Gardiners and the Crofts as much as she ever loved and looked up to anybody.


    • Wow – I’m flabberghasted to have received a response from the person I’m citing! Thank you!
      As far as the Crawfords go, I find myself vaccilating back and forth between the “they’re not so bad after all” (although I never go as far as Kingsley Amis, who seems to have been utterly enamoured with them and hated the Bertrams) and your “unredeemably rotten to the core” viewpoint.
      And you are right about the Gardiners and Crofts. It’s almost like they’re the flat-character good guys, to offset her flat-character baddies. They’re also the shining examples of happy marriages between intelligent people who genuinely love and respect each other, the promise of what’s in store for Elizabeth/Darcy and Anne/Wentworth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s